The catalogue of performed LCCs, LCAs and SLCAs explains, in a practical way, how to use environmental LCA, life cycle costing and social LCA when planning and designing interventions in the built environment. It brings together examples and best practices to help decision-makers assess environmental impacts, costs and social effects, so they can make choices that support both resilience and sustainability.

The integration of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Life Cycle Costing (LCC), and Social Life Cycle Assessment (s-LCA) is important for planning and designing resilience-enabling interventions within the built environment across various scales. These methodologies can be applied to ensure that interventions not only enhance resilience but also align with sustainability and social equity goals. In this context, the D3.2 presents a comprehensive analysis on the application of Environmental Life Cycle Assessment (e-LCA), Life Cycle Costing (LCC), and Social Life Cycle Assessment (s-LCA) methodologies on the planning and design of interventions in the built environment. It provides insights and collection of best practices and example on evaluating the environmental and social performance and economic aspects of the built environment and support and orientate decision-makers to optimize the planning and design processes to foster a built environment that is both resilient and sustainable. 

Building on the standard Environmental Life Cycle Assessment (eLCA), Life Cycle Costing (LCC), and Social Life Cycle Assessment (s-LCA) methdologies and guidelines, D2.3 presents a detailed approach to evaluate of planning and design of built environment interventions in terms of Environment, Economic and Social impacts. It presents a collection of reviewed methodologies and literature studies that addresses the environmental, economic, and social impacts throughout the entire life cycle of buildings covering material production, construction phase, use stage, and end-of-life with particular attention to renovation and refurbishment activities and their relevance to cultural heritage.

Yes, the Deliverable (report) is submitted, and it is publicly available.

The deliverable is intended for decision-makers and policy makers for informed urban planning and sustainability policies, planners, designers, architects and engineers to integrate sustainability assessments into the solutions designs and implementation. Also, for construction companies to consider the sustainability indicators during the identification of suppliers, used materials and equipment and to implement best practices in construction and renovation. Academic and research institutions, project involved partners and stakeholders.

The deliverable/results do not address a specific problem, it just adds more resources and information to support understanding and performing methodologies and best practices from various sectors, including those beyond the project’s primary focus, that can be applied to the planning and design of built environment interventions, including the cultural heritage.

Based on the methodologies and best practices presented in D3.2, an environmental life-cycle assessment and a social life-cycle assessment will be carried out with the aim of identifying the main environmental and social impacts associated to the implementation of the innovative solutions in the historical building subject of the Latvian demo.

Contact for more Information